Back to Blog

Why We Chose Polygon for Our Blockchain Layer

The technical decisions behind our choice of Polygon: low fees (~$0.001 per transaction), fast finality (5-10 seconds), Ethereum security inheritance, and battle-tested infrastructure.

The Blockchain Selection Challenge

When building a verification platform, the blockchain layer is critical. It needs to be:

  • Cost-effective - Our customers anchor millions of records
  • Fast - Users expect quick confirmations
  • Secure - Data integrity is our core promise
  • Reliable - Production systems need 99.9%+ uptime
  • Developer-friendly - We need good tooling and documentation

We evaluated multiple options before choosing Polygon. Here's our analysis.

The Candidates

We seriously evaluated five blockchain options:

Blockchain Type Avg Gas Fee Finality
Ethereum Mainnet Layer 1 $5-50+ 12-15 min
Polygon PoS Layer 2 (Sidechain) $0.001-0.01 5-10 sec
Arbitrum Layer 2 (Optimistic) $0.10-0.50 ~1 week*
Solana Layer 1 $0.00025 ~12 sec
BSC (BNB Chain) Layer 1 $0.05-0.20 ~3 sec

*Arbitrum's optimistic rollup has a 7-day challenge period for withdrawals, though transactions are usable immediately.

Why Not Ethereum Mainnet?

Ethereum is the most secure and decentralized public blockchain, but for a verification service, the costs are prohibitive:

Cost Analysis - Ethereum Mainnet
Scenario: 10,000 records per day

Gas per transaction:        ~50,000 gas
Average gas price:          30 gwei
ETH price:                  $3,000

Cost per transaction:       50,000 × 30 × 10⁻⁹ × $3,000
                          = $4.50 per transaction

With Merkle batching (256 records/TX):
  Daily transactions:       10,000 ÷ 256 = 40 TXs
  Daily cost:              40 × $4.50 = $180/day
  Monthly cost:            $5,400/month

// Too expensive for most use cases

At $5,400/month just for blockchain fees, Ethereum mainnet isn't viable for high-volume applications.

Why Not Solana?

Solana offers extremely low fees, but we had concerns:

  • Network stability: Multiple outages in 2022-2023
  • Different programming model: Rust-based, not EVM-compatible
  • Tooling maturity: Less mature than Ethereum ecosystem
  • Decentralization concerns: Fewer validators than Ethereum/Polygon
Reliability matters: For a verification service, uptime and data permanence are non-negotiable. Solana's outages were a dealbreaker.

Why Polygon?

After extensive evaluation, Polygon PoS emerged as the clear winner. Here's why:

1. Extremely Low Fees

Polygon's fees make enterprise-scale anchoring economically viable:

Cost Analysis - Polygon
Scenario: 10,000 records per day

Gas per transaction:        ~52,000 gas
Average gas price:          30 gwei (similar to Ethereum)
MATIC price:                $1.00

Cost per transaction:       52,000 × 30 × 10⁻⁹ × $1.00
                          = $0.00156 per transaction
                          ≈ $0.001 per transaction

With Merkle batching (256 records/TX):
  Daily transactions:       10,000 ÷ 256 = 40 TXs
  Daily cost:              40 × $0.001 = $0.04/day
  Monthly cost:            $1.20/month

Cost per record:           $0.04 ÷ 10,000 = $0.000004

// 4,500x cheaper than Ethereum mainnet!

2. Fast Finality

Polygon provides practical finality in 5-10 seconds:

Metric Polygon Ethereum
Block time ~2 seconds ~12 seconds
Confirmations for safety ~5 blocks ~32 blocks
Practical finality 5-10 seconds ~6 minutes

This means users get blockchain confirmation for their anchored data within seconds, not minutes.

3. Ethereum Compatibility

Polygon is EVM-compatible, which means:

  • Same tooling: ethers.js, web3.js, Hardhat, Remix all work
  • Same language: Solidity smart contracts
  • Same addresses: 0x format Ethereum addresses
  • Easy migration: Can deploy same contracts to Ethereum if needed
JavaScript - Works on both Polygon and Ethereum
import { ethers } from 'ethers';

// Same code works for both networks - just change RPC URL
const provider = new ethers.JsonRpcProvider(
  'https://polygon-mainnet.infura.io/v3/YOUR_KEY'  // Polygon
  // 'https://mainnet.infura.io/v3/YOUR_KEY'       // Ethereum
);

const wallet = new ethers.Wallet(privateKey, provider);

// Deploy contract - identical on both chains
const AnchoraAnchor = await ethers.getContractFactory('AnchoraAnchor');
const contract = await AnchoraAnchor.deploy();

// Anchor Merkle root - same interface
const tx = await contract.anchorRoot(merkleRoot, recordCount);
const receipt = await tx.wait();

console.log('Block:', receipt.blockNumber);
console.log('Gas used:', receipt.gasUsed.toString());

4. Security Model

Polygon PoS uses a Proof of Stake consensus with:

  • 100+ validators: Decentralized block production
  • Checkpointing to Ethereum: State roots committed to Ethereum mainnet periodically
  • Battle-tested: Billions of dollars secured since 2020
  • Bug bounty program: Active security research
Checkpointing: Polygon periodically commits state roots to Ethereum mainnet. This means Polygon inherits Ethereum's security for finalized state, while enjoying faster and cheaper transactions.

5. Mature Ecosystem

Polygon has excellent infrastructure:

  • Block explorers: Polygonscan (same interface as Etherscan)
  • RPC providers: Infura, Alchemy, QuickNode all support Polygon
  • Development tools: Full Hardhat, Foundry, Remix support
  • Testnet: Amoy testnet for development (previously Mumbai)
  • Documentation: Extensive guides and API references

Our Smart Contract

Here's our actual smart contract deployed on Polygon (simplified):

Solidity - AnchoraAnchor.sol
// SPDX-License-Identifier: MIT
pragma solidity ^0.8.19;

contract AnchoraAnchor {
    struct Batch {
        bytes32 merkleRoot;
        uint256 timestamp;
        address operator;
        uint256 recordCount;
    }

    mapping(uint256 => Batch) public batches;
    uint256 public totalBatches;

    event RootAnchored(
        uint256 indexed batchId,
        bytes32 merkleRoot,
        uint256 timestamp,
        address operator,
        uint256 recordCount
    );

    /// @notice Anchor a Merkle root to the blockchain
    /// @param _merkleRoot The root hash of the Merkle tree
    /// @param _recordCount Number of records in this batch
    function anchorRoot(
        bytes32 _merkleRoot,
        uint256 _recordCount
    ) external returns (uint256 batchId) {
        batchId = totalBatches++;

        batches[batchId] = Batch({
            merkleRoot: _merkleRoot,
            timestamp: block.timestamp,
            operator: msg.sender,
            recordCount: _recordCount
        });

        emit RootAnchored(
            batchId,
            _merkleRoot,
            block.timestamp,
            msg.sender,
            _recordCount
        );
    }

    /// @notice Verify a Merkle proof on-chain
    function verifyProof(
        uint256 _batchId,
        bytes32 _leaf,
        bytes32[] calldata _proof
    ) external view returns (bool) {
        bytes32 computedRoot = _leaf;

        for (uint256 i = 0; i < _proof.length; i++) {
            bytes32 proofElement = _proof[i];

            if (computedRoot < proofElement) {
                computedRoot = keccak256(
                    abi.encodePacked(computedRoot, proofElement)
                );
            } else {
                computedRoot = keccak256(
                    abi.encodePacked(proofElement, computedRoot)
                );
            }
        }

        return computedRoot == batches[_batchId].merkleRoot;
    }

    /// @notice Get batch details
    function getBatch(uint256 _batchId)
        external
        view
        returns (
            bytes32 merkleRoot,
            uint256 timestamp,
            address operator,
            uint256 recordCount
        )
    {
        Batch storage batch = batches[_batchId];
        return (
            batch.merkleRoot,
            batch.timestamp,
            batch.operator,
            batch.recordCount
        );
    }
}

Gas Costs in Practice

Here are our actual gas costs on Polygon:

Operation Gas Used Cost (USD)
anchorRoot() - 1 record ~50,000 ~$0.001
anchorRoot() - 256 records (batch) ~52,000 ~$0.001
verifyProof() on-chain ~30,000 ~$0.0006
getBatch() - read only 0 (view function) Free
Key insight: Gas cost is almost identical whether you anchor 1 record or 256 records, because you're storing the same amount of data (one 32-byte Merkle root). That's the power of Merkle tree batching.

Development Workflow

Our development workflow with Polygon:

Development Workflow
1. LOCAL DEVELOPMENT
   └─ Hardhat local node (instant transactions, free)
   └─ Unit tests with Hardhat

2. TESTNET (Polygon Amoy)
   └─ Free MATIC from faucet
   └─ Real network conditions
   └─ View transactions on amoy.polygonscan.com

3. MAINNET (Polygon PoS)
   └─ Real MATIC (~$1 per token)
   └─ ~$0.001 per transaction
   └─ View on polygonscan.com

Configuration in hardhat.config.js:
─────────────────────────────────

networks: {
  hardhat: {},  // Local testing

  amoy: {  // Testnet
    url: "https://polygon-amoy.infura.io/v3/KEY",
    accounts: [TESTNET_PRIVATE_KEY]
  },

  polygon: {  // Mainnet
    url: "https://polygon-mainnet.infura.io/v3/KEY",
    accounts: [MAINNET_PRIVATE_KEY]
  }
}

Viewing Transactions

Every anchored batch can be viewed on Polygonscan:

Example Transaction
Transaction Hash: 0xb706858a2c9e4a8e3d5f9c1a2b3d4e5f...
Block Number:     45,123,789
Timestamp:        Jan 18, 2026 10:30:45 AM UTC
From:             0x742d35Cc6634C0532925a3b844Bc9e7595f...
To:               0xAnchoraContract...
Value:            0 MATIC
Gas Used:         52,341
Gas Price:        30 gwei
Transaction Fee:  0.00157023 MATIC (~$0.00157)

Input Data:
  Function: anchorRoot(bytes32,uint256)
  merkleRoot: 0x9876543210fedcba9876543210fedcba...
  recordCount: 256

Event Emitted:
  RootAnchored(
    batchId: 30,
    merkleRoot: 0x9876...,
    timestamp: 1737196245,
    operator: 0x742d35...,
    recordCount: 256
  )

View at: https://polygonscan.com/tx/0xb706858a...

Future Considerations

While Polygon PoS is our current choice, we're monitoring:

Polygon zkEVM

Polygon's zero-knowledge rollup offers even stronger security guarantees. We may migrate to zkEVM once it matures further.

Multi-Chain Support

Some customers want anchoring on specific chains (Ethereum mainnet for maximum security, Arbitrum for specific ecosystems). We're evaluating multi-chain deployment.

Data Availability

Solutions like EigenDA and Celestia could further reduce costs while maintaining security. We're watching this space.

Conclusion

Polygon PoS provides the optimal balance for a verification service:

~$0.001 per transaction

4,500x cheaper than Ethereum mainnet

5-10 second finality

Near-instant confirmation for users

Ethereum security inheritance

Checkpointing to Ethereum mainnet

Full EVM compatibility

Same tools, same code, same ecosystem

Combined with Merkle tree batching (256 records per transaction), we achieve $0.000004 per record - making enterprise-scale blockchain anchoring economically viable.

Ready to anchor your data to Polygon?

Start with our free tier - 10,000 records per month, no credit card required.

Get Your API Key